I couldn't help but say: I'm thinking about the secondary utilization of traffic, I just feel bad for these high-quality user traffic, which does not conflict with the 28th principle . Then when executive email list I saw someone say "inaccurate traffic doesn't make sense", I quit the group. Let's analyze this from the perspective of user value: Because I am a big fan, I went to the event; During the activity, I found that the quality and knowledge level of many executive email list group friends are very high, and it is no problem to support several independent group owners; The book club reading activity is to cultivate KOLs and expand the scale of the community.
I desperately need someone who can recommend books for me and am interested in their KOL program. It is on the premise of such a high-trust endorsement, high-quality executive email list scenarios, precise supply and strong demand that I quit the group. If this happened in a project I run, I would definitely cry. 2. Can the 28 principle satisfy the user's refined operation? Why did an absolutely accurate user like me lose? I summed up executive email list a word in my little book - user noise . I call all actions that interfere with the user's non-negative behavior in the user operating environment as user noise. So in this case, what are the aspects of user noise?
CG display is not optimized, causing users to disturb; There is no hierarchical operation, resulting in loss of users. Whether it is in the community, community, or in the closed executive email list loop of its own APP, all UGC content that carries a demonstration role must be screened. Especially for content distribution like this kind of fixed-time punch-in , after trying to make users generate "muscle memory" in terms of time and templates, the content itself has become executive email list a decisive traffic inducement. The tone of this kind of content should be a little higher than the attributes of most people in order to better demonstrate and attract.